Write What You’ve Experienced
Pure observation can prompt ideas, but experience shapes story.
I touched on experience at the very beginning of this series, as part of write what you know. In that opening segment, I defined what you know narrowly, the way beginning writers often do, to make a humorous point about its inadequacy. Many writers interpret this advice as meaning we should write only what we’ve done, adhering closely to facts, or to write only about things we know well, topics we could teach in a classroom.
As an example, I noted that I had helped care for my elderly parents, though I would never describe myself a qualified provider of elder care. It’s not something I consider my expertise. Drop me in a stranger’s house and I might be able to whip up a sandwich or run a load of laundry, but I couldn’t offer any opinions about diet, physical exercise, or medications, and please don’t expect me to initiate small talk. I could barely handle that with my own folks.
So, in the strictest sense, I don’t know how to take care of the elderly.
But still, I had that experience. I couldn’t write a manual about caring for generic old people, but if I were inclined, I could write a story about siblings coping with the physical decline of their parents, about two old people who weren’t very good at the parenting thing and who perhaps didn’t care for their children as well as their adult children (a few of them anyway) would eventually come to care after them.
I could write about the tedium of preparing the same three or four meals on rotation and the constant blare of the television and having to hide the remote control from my mom because she had terrible taste in shows and an inexplicable habit of changing the channel ten minutes before the end of a program, which more than once sent me to Wikipedia to find out how an episode of Little House on the Prairie ended, even though I didn’t want to watch it in the first place.
I could tell you it was easier to get my dad to give up his car keys than for my mom to relinquish the check book, and that would tell you a lot about their personalities and marriage. I could write about watching for signs of forgetfulness or changes in eating habits that might suggest a new question about their health. I could tell you about all the information they withheld from their doctors over the years, because for my parents not knowing was always preferable to knowing, and I could probably connect some dots between that and their lifelong habit of keeping secrets.
I could tell you a lot more, but I won’t because most of it is gross. I’ll save it for the book.
As we parse write what you know into various components, there will be overlap. It may be hard to distinguish the difference between various strata but there is nuance.
What you know is transferable. You can teach what you know to someone. However, knowledge may or may not be relatable, depending on whether it has bearing on another person’s interests or well-being. In contrast, experience is relatable but not transferable. You cannot truly understand an experience unless you go through it.
Put another way: I will listen to your experience caring about an elderly parent, but I would never read a how-to manual about it.
Experience is also more than observation, though both can help you gain knowledge. When you observe, you watch, but may not interact. What you observe might make an impression on you, but it doesn’t touch you the same way internally and may not stay with you. In contrast, an experience is something you’ve done or something that has happened to you directly. Experience is intimate. Experience is a choice. Ideally, the choice is yours, but sadly others may choose to impose an experience on us.
Observation is passive, experience is active.
Importantly, experience has no regard for performance. In most cases, your experiences are more interesting because you didn’t excel. You had to struggle. You had to overcome obstacles. Experience is something you lived through. Experience is story.
What have you experienced?
Childhood, your teenage years, rites of passage, various first times, relationships, jobs. You may not believe your experiences amount to very much. I had that bad idea in my head for a long time. Some of your experiences might embarrass you or make you feel ashamed. Some might be too painful to talk about. But you have permission to talk about your experiences, even the ugly ones. And if you want to, you should.
Another difference: Experience triggers deeper emotions than observation.
If you’re writing with me, reflect back on experiences that have stayed with you. You might recall a moment that changed how you see the world or a peak experience, something that made you feel alive. Though I brought up sad and challenging experiences, don’t limit yourself to them. Rapture, belonging, and fulfillment are also experiences worth exploring. You might write about a time you crashed and burned or a time when you felt the full glory of faith.
Remember to cross-pollinate what happened and how you felt. What you felt adds context and depth. It adds perspective. In contrast, something you observe may anger or amuse you or make you think, but you may not have a strong emotional response until what you observe resonates. It may remind you about a time when you had a similar experience, which could trigger anger or empathy. Pure observation can prompt ideas, but experience shapes a story.
If you wanted someone to know you well, what would you tell them? If you trusted someone implicitly, if you were certain you wouldn’t be laughed at or betrayed, what would you share? Write that down. You don’t have to show this to anyone. Trust yourself and trust the writing.